The Veteran's appeal is remanded due to the need for a new VA examination to assess the current severity of his left elbow radial head fracture residuals, and to obtain all available VA treatment records since November 2013.
The deciding factor: The decision requires additional evidence and an updated medical assessment as the Veteran has not attended a VA examination in over two years and there are no recent VA treatment records for his condition.
- Claimed conditions
- left elbow radial head fracture residuals, left arm neurological disorder
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- September 17, 2018
- Citation
- 18135152
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 18135152.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for neck disability, back disability, bilateral foot neurological disorder, and left arm neurological disorder due to insufficient examination findings and need for further development.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection due to missing records and to clarify whether the Veteran served in Southwest Asia. The issues of reopening the cervical spasm and back condition claims are deferred until all missing records have been obtained.
- Granted
The Board has reopened the Veteran's claim for service connection of a left ankle disorder and granted it. The remaining issues are addressed in the remand portion.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.