The Veteran's bilateral foot and leg disabilities are found to have had their onset in service, warranting the grant of service connection.
The deciding factor: Service connection is granted as the Veteran's symptoms began during his service in Korea and persist to the current day, consistent with cold weather injuries sustained in service.
- Claimed conditions
- residuals of cold injury to the bilateral feet, residuals of cold injury to the bilateral legs
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- March 6, 2018
- Citation
- 1813600
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1813600.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board allowed the benefit or issue identified in this decision. Review the original order: other issues in the same appeal may have a different outcome, and this decision does not predict another claim.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for additional development due to failure to report for VA examinations and unclear notification of examination scheduling.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has determined that the Veteran's residuals of cold injury to the bilateral feet and partial amputation of the left foot are related to his in-service exposure, thus granting service connection for these conditions.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran seeks an effective date prior to October 30, 2006 for separate 30 percent ratings for residuals of a cold injury to the right foot and left foot. The Board finds that he is not entitled to such an earlier effective date due to lack of a formal or informal claim within one year before his increased rating claim was received.
- Whole decision: Granted
The veteran's death was caused by prostate cancer, which was aggravated by his service-connected PTSD and shell fragment wound residuals. The Board found that the veteran's service-connected disabilities contributed substantially or materially to cause death.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.