The Veteran's claim for service connection for residuals of transsphenoidal resection of pituitary tumor is granted, as the evidence shows that his vision problems began during active service and are related to his pituitary tumor.
The deciding factor: The evidence demonstrates that the Veteran’s pituitary tumor had existed prior to discovery and was likely responsible for his blurred vision in 1999.
- Claimed conditions
- pituitary tumor, blurred vision
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- September 18, 2018
- Citation
- 18136143
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 18136143.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board allowed the benefit or issue identified in this decision. Review the original order: other issues in the same appeal may have a different outcome, and this decision does not predict another claim.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board has denied service connection for Cushing's disease and pituitary tumor, finding that the evidence does not support a causal relationship to military service. The Veteran's conditions are attributed to her own diagnosis rather than exposure to toxic substances during service.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's claim for an increased rating of left trigeminal neuralgia was granted, and service connection was established for secondary conditions including blurred vision, dizziness, nausea/gastrointestinal symptoms, and sleep impairment.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that the previous remand for an addendum opinion addressing whether the Veteran's bilateral primary open-angle glaucoma with bilateral cataract was caused or aggravated by his service-connected sinus headaches and/or allergic rhinitis did not provide adequate opinions. The claim is being remanded to obtain such opinions.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Veteran withdrew his appeals for TDIU and all service connection claims, stating he is satisfied with the decisions made regarding his VA disability rating.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.