The Board has decided to remand the case due to conflicting evidence regarding the cause of the Veteran's heart valve disability and whether VA care was improper or inadequate in prescribing cabergoline. The Veteran needs a new medical opinion on these issues.
The deciding factor: The decision is based on conflicting evidence about the cause of the heart valve disability and whether VA care was improper or inadequate in prescribing cabergoline.
- Claimed conditions
- heart valve disability
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- September 20, 2018
- Citation
- 18137072
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 18137072.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has denied service connection for back pain, prostate disability, heart valve disability, hypertension, brain abnormality, bilateral knee disability, and arthritis in bilateral upper limbs.,The Veteran's claims for these conditions were previously remanded by the Board. Additional development is required as the RO did not substantially comply with the last remand.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for service connection are remanded due to the need for additional medical opinions regarding his claimed disabilities, particularly those related to radiation exposure.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for heart valve disability, finding that the evidence does not support a causal link between VA treatment and the disability.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded due to the need for additional medical records, specifically results of a March 11, 2015 VA cardiac evaluation and testing. The case will be readjudicated after these records are obtained.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.