The Veteran's claim for service connection for a back disability is denied as there was no in-service occurrence or aggravation of a disease or injury.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for a left knee disability is denied as there was no in-service occurrence or aggravation of a disease or injury.,The Veteran's claim for a compensable evaluation for her service-connected bilateral hearing loss is denied due to the lack of evidence showing significant hearing impairment that would warrant such a rating.,The Veteran's claim for an evaluation in excess of 10 percent disabling for her service-connected hypertension is denied as her symptoms do not meet the criteria for higher ratings.
The deciding factor: There was no documented occurrence or aggravation of back or left knee injuries during active service, and there is insufficient evidence to establish continuity of symptomatology post-service.,The Veteran's service treatment records did not document any in-service occurrences or aggravations of a left knee injury or disease. There is also insufficient evidence to establish continuity of symptomatology for the left knee disability.,The audiometric testing results do not indicate significant hearing impairment that would warrant a compensable rating, and there are no exceptional patterns of hearing impairment present.,Her hypertension requires continuous medication but her diastolic pressure has generally been below 100 and her systolic pressure has generally been below 200, which does not meet the criteria for higher ratings.
- Claimed conditions
- Back Disability, Left Knee Disability
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- September 24, 2018
- Citation
- 18137485
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 18137485.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's service-connected knee disabilities are rated at 10% each, and the Board finds that higher ratings are not warranted based on the evidence of record.
- Denied
The Board has determined that the Veteran's bilateral knee disabilities are not related to his active service, and thus denied both claims for service connection.
- Denied
The Veteran's left knee disability is currently rated at 30 percent, and the Board finds no evidence of clear and unmistakable error in assigning an effective date of June 19, 2002.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the Veteran's claims for increased ratings for his low back, left knee, and right knee disabilities due to inadequate VA examinations. The AOJ is instructed to obtain private treatment records from Mays & Schnapp Pain Management and schedule the Veteran for additional medical examinations.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.