Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Whole decision: Denied

The Veteran's epilepsy is rated at 20 percent, and the Board finds that a higher rating is not warranted.,Service connection for low back disability has been denied as new and material evidence was not received to reopen the claim. The claim remains denied.,The Veteran's stroke residuals are not service connected due to lack of direct or secondary service connection.,The Veteran's TDIU claim is denied.

The deciding factor: The preponderance of the competent medical evidence does not support a higher rating for epilepsy, as the Veteran’s statements regarding her seizure frequency and nature are deemed inconsistent with objective medical records.,No new and material evidence has been received to reopen the low back disability claim. The July 2004 denial was based on lack of competent medical evidence pertaining to aggravation of a preexisting condition.,The March 2017 VA clinician's opinion concluded that the Veteran’s strokes are not proximately due to or the result of her service-connected epilepsy, thus secondary service connection is denied.,VA determined that the schedular rating criteria for a TDIU rating are not met and referral for consideration of a TDIU rating on an extraschedular basis is not warranted.

Claimed conditions
Epilepsy, Low back disability (previously denied), Left-sided weakness, lower extremity, Left-sided weakness, upper extremity, Decreased sensation, left side of face
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating
Not verified here — check the original decision
Decision date
September 25, 2018
Citation
18138360

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 18138360.

What this means for you

A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.

What you can do next

Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.