The Board has granted service connection for the cause of the Veteran’s death and service-connected burial benefits, finding that the Veteran's service-connected disabilities contributed substantially or materially to his death.
The deciding factor: The evidence is at least evenly balanced as to whether the service-connected residuals of subdural hematoma, post traumatic with post traumatic headaches contributed substantially or materially to cause the Veteran’s death.
- Claimed conditions
- residuals of subdural hematoma, post traumatic with post traumatic headaches, partial skull loss, seventh nerve paralysis, left hemiplegia
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 100%
- Decision date
- September 28, 2018
- Citation
- 18139584
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 18139584.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected expressive aphasia with left hemiplegia is rated at a 100 percent initial rating effective October 4, 2024. The Veteran also receives SMC for complete organic aphonia with constant inability to communicate by speech, loss of use of the left arm, and loss of use of the left leg.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for further development due to insufficient evidence regarding the Veteran's acute right cerebrovascular accident and left hemiplegia, including potential service connection based on exposure to contaminated water at Camp Lejeune.
- Granted
The Board has granted an earlier effective date of July 31, 2008 for the award of special monthly compensation (SMC) based on 38 U.S.C. § 1114(r)-(1). The March 2016 rating decision was found to have made a clear and unmistakable error in applying the law or regulations.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that the Veteran's claim for special monthly compensation for aid and attendance needs to be remanded due to inconsistencies in medical evaluations, lack of clarity on current level of care, and need for further examination. The case will be returned for clarification of the current level of special monthly compensation and a new examination.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.