Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient evidence regarding the etiology of the Veteran's bladder cancer, specifically whether it is related to service exposure. The Veteran will need a VA examination and additional records.

The deciding factor: Bladder cancer was not presumed by law to be caused by herbicide exposure, but this does not preclude a finding that it may still be linked to such exposure based on the evidence of record.

Claimed conditions
Bladder cancer
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
Burn pits / airborne hazards
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
October 1, 2018
Citation
18139910

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 18139910.

What this means for you

A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.