The Veteran's appeal was denied because the claim was based on an invalid regulation. The case is being remanded to reassess the eligibility for VA reimbursement of unauthorized medical expenses.
The deciding factor: The previous decision relied on a now-invalid regulation, which has been amended and does not apply to this case.
- Claimed conditions
- confusion, transient ischemic attack
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- October 5, 2018
- Citation
- 18140691
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 18140691.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands all service connection claims for additional development, including obtaining a TERA memorandum and new medical opinions.
- Partly granted
The Board granted service connection for hypertension, coronary artery disease, asthma, transient ischemic attack, neurocognitive disorder (dementia), and acquired psychiatric disorder (other specified depressive disorder) but denied service connection for renal toxicity. Several issues were remanded.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for service connection for transient ischemic attack and hypertension to obtain additional medical opinions addressing secondary service connection theories, including potential links to the Veteran's service-connected persistent depressive disorder with generalized anxiety disorder and Camp Lejeune exposures.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for a compensable evaluation for transient ischemic attack, as there was no evidence of symptoms to a compensable degree during the period of appeal.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.