The Veteran's claim for typhoid due to mustard gas exposure is denied as there is no credible evidence of such exposure in service.,The Veteran's claim for osteoporosis due to an undiagnosed illness or other qualifying, chronic disability pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 1117 is denied as he did not serve in the Southwest Asia theatre of operations and there is no credible evidence linking his condition to service.,The Veteran's claim for exposure to molds is denied as such exposure alone does not constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes.,The Veteran's claim for small pox due to herbicide exposure and service in Southwest Asia is denied as he did not serve in the Southwest Asia theatre of operations and there is no credible evidence linking his condition to service.,The Veteran's claim for exposure to anthrax and asbestos is denied as there is no credible evidence of such exposures in service.
The deciding factor: There is no credible evidence of mustard gas exposure or small pox due to herbicide exposure in service. The Veteran did not serve in the Southwest Asia theatre of operations.,The Veteran's service records are silent regarding osteoporosis and there is no credible evidence linking his condition to service. He did not serve in the Southwest Asia theatre of operations.,Exposure to molds alone does not constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes.,There is no credible evidence of small pox due to herbicide exposure or service in the Southwest Asia theatre of operations. The Veteran did not serve in the Southwest Asia theatre of operations.,There is no credible evidence of anthrax and asbestos exposures in service.
- Claimed conditions
- typhoid, osteoporosis, small pox
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- October 5, 2018
- Citation
- 18140785
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 18140785.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board has granted an increase in PCAFC benefits to Level 2, finding that the Veteran requires continuous supervision or protection due to his cognitive decline and repeated falls.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected digestive system conditions rendered him in need of regular aid and attendance from another person, leading to the grant of special monthly compensation based on this need.
- Granted
The Veteran's right foot disability, including arthritis, osteoporosis, foot drop, neuropathy, difficult gait, and tinea pedis, was incurred during service and continues to this day.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the cases for further development and examination, including a VA spine examination to determine if any lumbar spine disabilities are related to service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.