The Veteran's appeal for payment or reimbursement of unauthorized medical expenses incurred at CMC on February 27, 2017, is denied because the services rendered were not in a medical emergency and there was no prior authorization from VA.
The deciding factor: The condition did not meet the criteria for a medical emergency as it was a scheduled follow-up appointment after an initial heart attack, and delay would not have been hazardous to life or health.
- Claimed conditions
- Myocardial infarction (heart attack)
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- October 9, 2018
- Citation
- 18141068
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 18141068.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board has granted the Veteran's claim for payment or reimbursement of ambulance travel expenses incurred on June 17, 2025 due to an emergency heart attack. The ambulance service was provided by a volunteer organization and later intercepted by a higher-tier EMT company.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient evidence regarding the Veteran's additional periods of service, which are necessary for a proper determination on his cause of death and any related service connection claims.
- Granted
The Veteran's death was caused by a subarachnoid hemorrhage, which is presumed to be due to exposure to Agent Orange. The myocardial infarction (heart attack) that contributed to the Veteran's death is also presumptively service-connected as it falls under the criteria for IHD in Vietnam veterans.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.