The Board has determined that new and material evidence has not been received to reopen the claim of service connection for a bilateral foot disability (claimed as arthritis). The May 2018 VA examination did not provide a nexus opinion.,New and material evidence having been received, the claim of entitlement to service connection for a skin disability, to include as secondary to herbicide exposure, is reopened. However, the Board has determined that remand is necessary due to insufficient medical opinions regarding the etiology of the Veteran's skin disabilities.
The deciding factor: The May 2018 VA examination did not provide a nexus opinion linking the Veteran’s bilateral foot disability to his service.,The VA examiner in the May 2018 skin conditions examination failed to address whether the diagnosed skin conditions are related to herbicide exposure.
- Claimed conditions
- Bilateral Foot Disability (claimed as arthritis), Skin Disability
- How they argued it
- Secondary to another service-connected condition
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- October 17, 2018
- Citation
- 18142891
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 18142891.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Partly granted
The Board has readjudicated the claims for service connection for PTSD, bilateral hearing loss disability, cervical spine disability, skin disability, and peripheral neuropathy of both upper extremities. The decision is mixed as some issues are granted while others are remanded.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied service connection for various disabilities and denied higher ratings for several service-connected conditions.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the claims for service connection for OSA and a skin disability, as well as the claim for service connection for OSA secondary to PTSD. The Veteran's exposure to burn pits is not considered new evidence, but his assertion of aggravation by PTSD is.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is partially granted with a 50 percent rating for PTSD. The claims of service connection for a skin disability and gastrointestinal disability are remanded due to the need for additional development.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.