Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Whole decision: Denied

The Veteran's erectile dysfunction is rated as noncompensable (0 percent) throughout the appeal period.,The Veteran's voiding dysfunction residual of prostate cancer is currently rated at 40 percent, and a higher rating is not warranted under current criteria.,The Veteran’s service-connected scar, status post radical prostatectomy, does not meet the criteria for a compensable rating based on its size or instability.,PTSD is currently rated at 50 percent, with no further increase in rating being granted.

The deciding factor: There was no evidence of penile deformity to warrant a compensable rating under Diagnostic Code 7522 for erectile dysfunction. The Veteran's voiding dysfunction residuals did not meet the criteria for a higher rating based on urinary frequency or obstructed voiding.,The Veteran’s PTSD symptoms, while significant, did not meet the criteria for a higher rating of 70 percent or 100 percent due to his ability to maintain effective work and social relationships. The current 50 percent rating adequately reflects his impairment.,The Veteran's scar was found to be non-painful and stable, with no area greater than 39 square centimeters, thus not meeting the criteria for a compensable rating under Diagnostic Code 7802 or 7804.

Claimed conditions
Erectile Dysfunction, Voiding Dysfunction Residual of Prostate Cancer, Scar, Status Post Radical Prostatectomy
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating
Not verified here — check the original decision
Decision date
October 23, 2018
Citation
18143817

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 18143817.

What this means for you

A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.

What you can do next

Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.