The Veteran's penis deformity, including corpral fibrosis, was not caused by VA treatment and is not compensable under 38 U.S.C. § 1151.
The deciding factor: VA did not fail to exercise the degree of care expected from a reasonable health care provider when prescribing Caverject injections, nor did there appear to be an event that was not reasonably foreseeable.
- Claimed conditions
- corpral fibrosis, penis deformity
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- October 25, 2018
- Citation
- 18144131
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 18144131.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for a higher rating for erectile dysfunction and prostate cancer, and an earlier effective date for the increased rating of erectile dysfunction.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's case is being remanded due to the need for additional development, specifically obtaining consent forms related to his April 2008 penis procedure.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for kidney disability, prostate condition, meningioma of the brain (claimed as brain cancer, brain infection, brain damage), anemia, right foot disability, left foot disability, skull deformity, erectile dysfunction, and penis deformity due to Agent Orange exposure and/or Camp Lejeune contaminated water.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the issue of service connection for erectile dysfunction due to in-service exposure to herbicide agents or as secondary to a service-connected disability, including diabetes mellitus type II. The Veteran's claims are not supported by adequate medical opinions and further examination is required.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.