The Veteran's loss of bladder control is not considered to be due to VA surgical care, and the Board finds that it was not caused by negligence or lack of proper skill. The preponderance of evidence does not support a finding of fault on the part of VA.
The deciding factor: The medical opinion found no indication of negligence or malpractice in the performance of the surgery, and the Veteran's own statements do not provide competent medical evidence to corroborate his belief that there was fault, accident or negligence.
- Claimed conditions
- loss of bladder control
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- October 25, 2018
- Citation
- 18144135
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 18144135.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Board dismissed the claim for entitlement to service connection for prostate cancer and denied earlier effective dates for the awards of service connection for loss of use of the bilateral lower legs and loss of bladder control.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for erectile dysfunction, loss of bowel control, and loss of bladder control as they were not caused by carelessness, negligence, lack of proper skill, error in judgment, or similar instances of fault on the part of VA.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's left and right lower extremity radiculopathies, sciatic nerve, are each granted a 40 percent rating.,Service connection for loss of bladder control and loss of bowel control is granted as secondary to service-connected low back disability and gastritis with irritable bowel syndrome.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's claims for loss of bladder control, loss of bowel control, and erectile dysfunction were denied as the evidence did not show that VA treatment caused these conditions.,VA treatment was found to be appropriate and within standard practice, with informed consent provided.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.