Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Veteran's right shoulder sprain is being remanded for a VA examination to determine if it is secondary to his service-connected left shoulder degenerative changes.,The Veteran's left hand numbness and right hand numbness are being remanded for a VA examination to determine their relationship to his service-connected conditions or other factors.,The Veteran's left shoulder degenerative changes are being remanded for a VA examination to assess the current severity of his condition, including range of motion limitations due to pain.,The Veteran's lumbosacral strain with thoracic spine degenerative changes is being remanded for a VA examination to assess the current severity of his condition, including range of motion limitations due to pain.,The Veteran's pseudofolliculitis barbae is being remanded for a VA dermatologist opinion on whether his topical treatment constitutes systemic therapy.,The Veteran's TDIU claim is being remanded as it is inextricably intertwined with the other claims.

The deciding factor: The Board finds that additional development is needed to determine if the right shoulder sprain is secondary to the service-connected left shoulder degenerative changes, and whether the numbness of both hands are related to his service-connected conditions or other factors.,The Board finds that additional development is needed to assess the current severity of the Veteran's left shoulder degenerative changes, including range of motion limitations due to pain. The Veteran also needs a VA examination for his back disability, and whether his pseudofolliculitis barbae requires systemic therapy as per Johnson v. Shulkin.,The TDIU claim is being remanded because it is inextricably intertwined with the other claims.

Claimed conditions
Right Shoulder Sprain, Left Hand Numbness, Right Hand Numbness, Left Shoulder Degenerative Changes, Lumbosacral Strain with Thoracic Spine Degenerative Changes, Pseudofolliculitis Barbae
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
October 25, 2018
Citation
18144687

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 18144687.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.