Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Partly grantedPACT Act

The service connection claims for a lumbar spine disability and sleep apnea are reopened. Service connection for CAD due to herbicide exposure is granted.,Service connection for hypertension secondary to diabetes, CAD, or both is remanded for further examination and opinion.,Increased ratings for left and right lower extremity diabetic peripheral neuropathy are remanded for a VA examination.,Service connection for a lumbar spine disability as secondary to service-connected left ankle disability is remanded for a nexus opinion.,The Veteran's hypertension claim remains pending due to insufficient evidence.,The Veteran's sleep apnea claim remains pending due to insufficient evidence.,The Veteran's back disability claim remains pending due to insufficient evidence.

The deciding factor: New and material evidence has been received for the lumbar spine and sleep apnea claims, allowing them to be reopened. Service connection for CAD is granted based on herbicide exposure in service.,Service connection for hypertension secondary to diabetes, CAD, or both remains pending due to insufficient evidence.,Increased ratings for diabetic peripheral neuropathy are remanded as further examination and opinion are needed.,Service connection for a lumbar spine disability as secondary to left ankle disability is remanded as the relationship between these conditions needs clarification.,The Veteran's hypertension claim remains pending because there is insufficient evidence to determine if it was incurred in service or related to diabetes, CAD, or both.,The Veteran's sleep apnea claim remains pending due to insufficient evidence regarding its relation to diabetes and herbicide exposure.,The Veteran's back disability claim remains pending as the relationship between his left ankle disability and hypertension needs clarification.

Claimed conditions
lumbar spine disability, sleep apnea, coronary artery disease/ischemic heart disease (CAD/IHD), hypertension
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
October 26, 2018
Citation
18145051

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 18145051.

What this means for you

A partial grant means some issues were granted while others were denied or remanded — common in multi-issue claims. Look at which issues went which way, and how each was argued.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.