The Board has determined that additional development is needed to address the Veteran's calluses of the bilateral feet, including obtaining his TriWest healthcare records and scheduling a VA examination. The case will be remanded for these actions.
The deciding factor: The Veteran reported altered walking patterns and decreased quality of life due to his calluses, warranting further evaluation and evidence collection.
- Claimed conditions
- calluses of the bilateral feet
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- October 30, 2018
- Citation
- 18145885
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 18145885.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's service-connected calluses of the bilateral feet are manifested by pain and require periodic debridement. The disability is no more than mild in severity, and a higher rating is not warranted.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the cases of service connection for calluses of the bilateral feet and bilateral pes planus due to insufficient medical opinions. The Veteran's reports of symptoms since service are not considered in these decisions.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's claims for service connection and increased ratings were denied. The Board found that the evidence did not support a finding of an in-service event, injury, or disease leading to her current stomach disability. For other conditions, the evidence was insufficient to grant higher ratings.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the Veteran's claims for service connection and rating determinations related to her stomach disability, varicose veins in the left leg, calluses of the bilateral feet, and right breast scar. The cases are being returned for additional examinations and opinions.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.