The Veteran's appeal is remanded due to the need for additional examinations and evaluations regarding her service-connected residual scars, joint impairment, muscle damage, and recurrent right wrist ganglion cyst. The current ratings are not sufficient as there are issues with the existing VA examination reports.
The deciding factor: The decision notes that the existing VA examination reports do not comply with regulations requiring range of motion testing in cases of joint disabilities, particularly for the Veteran's right wrist. Therefore, additional evaluations and examinations are necessary to provide a complete picture of her service-connected conditions.
- Claimed conditions
- residual scars from status post ganglion cyst and status post cesarean section, recurrent right wrist ganglion cyst, residual joint impairment, right wrist, residual muscle damage, right wrist
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- October 30, 2018
- Citation
- 18146000
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 18146000.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied an increased initial rating for the veteran's right wrist tenosynovitis with arthritis in the radiocarpal joint and a higher rating for his recurrent right wrist ganglion cyst, as the evidence did not support ratings greater than 30 percent and 10 percent respectively.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
- Denied
The Veteran's service-connected musculoligamentous strain, right knee, is currently rated at 10 percent and the Board finds that a higher rating is not warranted.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.