Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's right arm and/or elbow disorder is denied as there is no current diagnosis.,Service connection for degenerative disc disease of the cervical spine was properly severed from June 30, 2014 due to a post-service injury.,Right upper extremity radiculopathy associated with degenerative disc disease of the cervical spine was properly severed from June 30, 2014 as it is secondary to a pre-existing condition.,Left upper extremity radiculopathy associated with degenerative disc disease of the cervical spine was properly severed from June 30, 2014 due to a post-service injury.,Right lower extremity radiculopathy associated with intervertebral disc syndrome of the thoracolumbar spine was properly severed from June 30, 2014 as it is secondary to a pre-existing condition.,Left lower extremity radiculopathy associated with intervertebral disc syndrome of the thoracolumbar spine was properly severed from June 30, 2014 due to a post-service injury.

The deciding factor: There is no current diagnosis of a right arm and/or elbow disorder.,The evidence shows that any current cervical spine disability is not related to service but rather to a post-service injury in July 2006.,Right upper extremity radiculopathy is secondary to the pre-existing cervical spine condition, which was incurred after service.,Left upper extremity radiculopathy is also secondary to the pre-existing cervical spine condition, which occurred after service.,Right lower extremity radiculopathy and left lower extremity radiculopathy are both secondary to a post-service injury in July 2006.

Claimed conditions
Right arm/elbow disorder, Degenerative disc disease of the cervical spine, Right upper extremity radiculopathy, Left upper extremity radiculopathy, Right lower extremity radiculopathy, Left lower extremity radiculopathy
How they argued it
Secondary to another service-connected condition
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
October 31, 2018
Citation
18146676

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 18146676.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.