The Board has remanded three issues related to the Veteran's service-connected left knee disabilities: increased ratings for recurrent dislocation of the left knee and arthritis due to limitation of extension, as well as an earlier effective date for arthritis. The AOJ is instructed to obtain additional medical records from OPM regarding the Veteran's 2005 disability retirement from USPS.
The deciding factor: The Board found that VA did not comply with its previous remand directives concerning the Veteran’s medical records pertaining to his 2005 disability retirement from USPS, and thus ordered further development of these records.
- Claimed conditions
- Recurrent dislocation of the left knee, Arthritis due to limitation of extension of the left knee
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 6, 2018
- Citation
- 18147941
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 18147941.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded due to the need for additional development of his claims, including obtaining updated medical records and scheduling an examination.
- Denied
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings and an effective date prior to August 28, 2007 were denied. The Board found that the Veteran's disability picture did not meet criteria for higher ratings under applicable diagnostic codes.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.