The Veteran's initial increased evaluation for residuals of right wrist volar ganglion is denied. The Veteran was previously granted a noncompensable rating, and the current appeal seeks an increase to at least 10 percent.,For the period from April 1, 2008, to December 1, 2008, and February 1, 2009, to January 22, 2014, the Veteran's initial increased evaluation for residuals of left lateral meniscectomy with osteoarthritis is denied. The Veteran was previously granted a 10 percent rating, and the current appeal seeks an increase to at least 30 percent.,For the period beginning September 7, 2017, the Veteran's increased evaluation for residuals of left lateral meniscectomy with osteoarthritis (post total knee arthroplasty) is granted. The Veteran was previously rated as 60 percent disabled and now receives a higher rating of 60 percent.
The deciding factor: The evidence does not support an increase in the evaluation for the period prior to September 7, 2017, due to limited range of motion (flexion) at worst to 70 degrees. The Veteran's wrist disability is rated under DC 5214 for limitation of wrist motion.,For the period from April 1, 2008, to December 1, 2008, and February 1, 2009, to January 22, 2014, the Veteran's initial increased evaluation is denied as his flexion was limited to at least 90 degrees with pain. The Veteran reported instability, popping, locking episodes, and use of a cane.,For the period beginning September 7, 2017, the Veteran's increased evaluation for residuals of left lateral meniscectomy with osteoarthritis (post total knee arthroplasty) is granted as his flexion was limited to at least 20 degrees with pain. The Veteran reported instability, popping, locking episodes, and use of a cane.
- Claimed conditions
- Residuals of right wrist volar ganglion, Residuals of left lateral meniscectomy with osteoarthritis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 7, 2018
- Citation
- 18148331
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 18148331.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
- Denied
The Veteran's service-connected musculoligamentous strain, right knee, is currently rated at 10 percent and the Board finds that a higher rating is not warranted.
- Granted
The Veteran's claim for service connection for PTSD is granted as the evidence shows a current diagnosis of PTSD, an in-service stressor, and a medical link between the two.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.