Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Board has decided to remand the cases for further development and consideration due to a lack of a complete copy of an article from the Ryukyu Shimpo Paper, which discusses levels of Agent Orange debris in Okinawa City.

The deciding factor: The article is central to the Veteran's arguments in support of his claims and its availability is necessary for proper adjudication.

Claimed conditions
diabetes mellitus, type II, prostatectomy status post carcinoma
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
Agent Orange / herbicides
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
November 8, 2018
Citation
18148737

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 18148737.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.