The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient evidence regarding the Veteran's left kidney disability, specifically whether it is related to his service-connected hypertension and exposure to herbicides.
The deciding factor: The decision was based on a lack of sufficient evidence to determine if the Veteran's left kidney disability is related to his service-connected hypertension or exposure to herbicides.
- Claimed conditions
- left kidney disability, renal mass
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- Agent Orange / herbicides
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 8, 2018
- Citation
- 18149077
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 18149077.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for a left kidney disability, finding that there was no evidence of such a condition during his active duty and concluding that any current symptoms are not related to his military service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the Veteran's claims for service connection for a left knee disability and a left kidney disability due to inadequate medical examinations in the past, and because of a duty to assist error regarding private treatment records. The Veteran will need to provide information about his private treatment and VA will obtain these records.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for further development of evidence related to herbicide exposure and toxic exposure risk activities (TERAs) during service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for a medical opinion under the PACT Act regarding the Veteran's kidney disorder and its potential relation to his service at Camp Lejeune, as well as an opinion on whether the Veteran's service-connected hepatocellular carcinoma with hepatectomy has aggravated his kidney disorder.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.