The Board denied payment or reimbursement for non-VA medical care under the Camp Lejeune Family Member Program (CLFMP) because the appellant did not reside at Camp Lejeune and was not in utero during her husband's service period. The claim is denied as she has not submitted evidence of treatment for covered illnesses or conditions.
The deciding factor: The appellant failed to demonstrate residency at Camp Lejeune and lack of medical records for covered conditions.
- Claimed conditions
- female infertility, miscarriage
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- November 15, 2018
- Citation
- 18150697
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 18150697.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the claims for miscarriage, cervical spine disability, lumbar spine disability, and right elbow disability due to insufficient examination opinions and incomplete service history verification.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims of service connection for uterine fibroids, incontinence, female infertility, and recurrent bladder infections due to insufficient medical opinions regarding their etiology.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board granted service connection for a hysterectomy and miscarriage, both etiologically related to the Veteran's active-duty service, including potential herbicide exposure.
- Whole decision: Partly granted
The Board granted an initial rating of 20 percent for peripheral nephropathy, right foot associated with right foot strain and a 50 percent rating for hysterectomy. The claims for a compensable rating for miscarriage and an increased rating in excess of 40 percent for degenerative arthritis of the spine were denied.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.