The Board has remanded the case due to the need for additional evidence related to the Veteran's right knee disability and TBI claim, including medical records from his total knee replacement and any VA treatment he may have received.
The deciding factor: The decision was remanded because of the need for additional evidence regarding the Veteran's current condition and treatment history.
- Claimed conditions
- right knee meniscectomy, residuals of traumatic brain injury (TBI) with headaches
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 15, 2018
- Citation
- 18150785
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 18150785.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for earlier effective dates and increased ratings, as well as service connection for obstructive sleep apnea and tinnitus.
- Granted
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings and TDIU were granted, with specific disability ratings assigned. The left knee degenerative joint disease received a separate rating of 10 percent for limitation of flexion and another 30 percent for limitation of extension. For the right knee, prior to April 30, 2014, he was awarded a 10 percent rating for limitation of flexion and a 30 percent rating for limitation of extension. From June 1, 2015 onwards, his total right knee replacement received a 60 percent disability rating. The Veteran also received TDIU prior to October 28, 2010.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to non-compliance with previous remand directives, specifically regarding clarification from Dr. J.M.H. on his November 2015 private medical evaluation of the Veteran's service-connected knees.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) due to his service-connected disabilities, including prostate cancer and tinnitus. The Board found that the Veteran's service-connected conditions did not preclude him from securing and following substantially gainful employment.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.