The Veteran's heart disability was denied as not related to service-connected diabetes. His peripheral neuropathy of the right upper extremity is currently rated at 10%.,The Veteran's TDIU claim due to his service-connected disabilities has been granted.
The deciding factor: Service connection for non-ischemic cardiomyopathy was denied as there was no evidence linking it to service-connected diabetes. Service connection for peripheral neuropathy of the right upper extremity was granted based on its secondary relationship to service-connected diabetes.
- Claimed conditions
- Non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, Peripheral neuropathy of the right upper extremity/carpal tunnel syndrome
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 10%
- Decision date
- March 13, 2018
- Citation
- 1815160
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1815160.
What this means for you
A partial grant means some issues were granted while others were denied or remanded — common in multi-issue claims. Look at which issues went which way, and how each was argued.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for service connection for Tachy-Brady syndrome, atrial fibrillation, and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy due to an inadequate VA examination and a need for additional evidence.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for an initial rating in excess of 30 percent for his heart disability is being remanded due to the need for additional VA treatment records from non-VA providers and a complete copy of records from Yakima Memorial Heart, Lung, and Vascular.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board previously denied the claim for service connection for CHF. The Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (Court) has remanded the case due to an inadequate statement of reasons or bases regarding the adequacy of the August 2021 VA examination, which did not consider the recent holding in Spicer v. McDonough.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's heart disability is currently rated at 30 percent, and the Board has decided to remand the case for a new examination due to an indication of worsening symptoms.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.