Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's increased rating claim for her left lower extremity sciatica is remanded due to the failure to issue a supplemental statement of the case (SSOC) after new evidence was added to the record.

The deciding factor: Due process required as the AOJ did not prepare an SSOC in consideration of the July 2016 VA examination, which addressed the Veteran's left lower extremity sciatica claim.

Claimed conditions
sciatica of the left lower extremity
How they argued it
Secondary to another service-connected condition
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
November 26, 2018
Citation
18152870

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 18152870.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.