The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for increased ratings and service connection due to inconsistencies in the medical evidence and the need for additional examinations.
The deciding factor: The decision is based on the need for clarification of the severity of the Veteran’s current left wrist and fracture of the distal left 4th metacarpal disabilities, as well as an examination to determine the nature and etiology of his back disability.
- Claimed conditions
- Degenerative Joint Disease (DJD) of the left wrist, Fracture of the distal left 4th metacarpal
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 26, 2018
- Citation
- 18152942
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 18152942.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's left wrist condition is already rated at the maximum 10 percent level due to limitation of motion, and there is no joint ankylosis or separately ratable pathology. The claim for a higher rating is denied.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded multiple claims for service connection, including for DJD of various joints and related disabilities such as hypothyroidism, diabetes mellitus, diabetic neuropathy, and tinnitus. The claims are being returned to the RO for further development.
- Denied
The Board found that the veteran's DJD of the left wrist and left hand disability were not caused by his service-connected left elbow disability or his active military service, and therefore denied both claims.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.