The Veteran's application to reenter a Vocational Rehabilitation and Employment (VR&E) program was denied because his service-connected disabilities did not prevent him from performing the duties of an unpaid minister, which he had been found rehabilitated for.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's service-connected disabilities did not worsen to the extent that they prevented him from performing the duties of a minister, as he continued to hold this position and was previously determined to be rehabilitated in part due to his status as an unpaid minister.
- Claimed conditions
- Service-connected disabilities
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- November 29, 2018
- Citation
- 18154010
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 18154010.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's TDIU claim was denied due to incomplete VA Forms, and the Board finds this a procedural error warranting corrective action before adjudicating the appeal on the merits.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's request for additional VR&E services, other than employment services, to include additional education and training benefits. The decision found that his current goal of obtaining a bachelor's degree was not reasonably necessary to achieve suitable employment.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's VR&E benefits were denied as he had sufficient education and training to find suitable employment, despite his service-connected disabilities.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's claim for special monthly compensation based on aid and attendance was granted effective September 4, 2019. The decision is based on the need for regular aid and assistance due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.