The Veteran's son was recognized as a helpless child during his lifetime, but the appellant failed to provide sufficient medical and income evidence to establish continued entitlement to VA death pension.
The deciding factor: The appellant did not submit sufficient medical and income evidence to demonstrate his current helplessness and financial status required for VA death pension benefits.
- Claimed conditions
- neurofibroma
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- December 4, 2018
- Citation
- 18155084
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 18155084.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for seborrheic keratosis and neurofibroma, finding that there is no evidence to support a link between these conditions and his military service.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied service connection for a skin rash, tinea cruris, and neurofibroma as the evidence did not support an in-service event or link to service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the cases of seborrheic keratosis and neurofibroma due to conflicting findings regarding their etiology, specifically whether they are related to service exposure. The Veteran's skin conditions have been diagnosed as common noncancerous growths with no clear evidence linking them to sun or herbicide exposure.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection for skin cancer and neurofibroma, both claimed as secondary to herbicide exposure. The case is sent back for additional development including obtaining a medical opinion on whether these conditions are due to the Veteran's presumed in-service herbicide exposure.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.