The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient evidence regarding whether the Veteran's vision condition is aggravated by his service-connected diabetes.
The deciding factor: The opinion requested determines if the Veteran’s vision condition was aggravated by his service-connected diabetes, which requires a different standard than secondary service connection.
- Claimed conditions
- vision condition
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- December 4, 2018
- Citation
- 18155542
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 18155542.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has found that readjudication of the previously denied claims of entitlement to service connection for a right hand disability and a bilateral eye disability is warranted. The AOJ will now consider these matters on their merits.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for a right finger amputation, SMC based on loss of use of a creative organ, and service connection for diabetic nephropathy, right foot contusion, vision condition, LLE PN, RLE PN, LUE PN, and RUE PN is dismissed due to procedural issues.,The Veteran's appeal for service connection for LLE PN, RLE PN, LUE PN, and RUE PN was dismissed as untimely.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for service connection for a vision condition and erectile dysfunction to correct pre-decisional duty to assist errors.
- Whole decision: Partly granted
The Board granted service connection for tinnitus but denied it for hearing loss and a vision condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.