Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The claim of service connection for gout is reopened, but the Veteran does not have a current diagnosis and there is no evidence linking it to service.,Service connection for a lower back condition is denied as there is no current disability and no evidence linking it to service.,Service connection for diabetes mellitus is denied due to lack of continuity of symptoms since service and absence of medical evidence linking the condition to service.,Service connection for hemorrhoids is denied as there is no current diagnosis and no evidence linking it to service.,Service connection for knot on groin (claimed as lymph node condition and possible hernia) is denied as there is no current disability and no evidence linking it to service.,Service connection for chronic laryngitis is granted.

The deciding factor: The Veteran does not have a current diagnosis of gout, and the medical evidence does not support a finding that his symptoms are related to service. The lower back condition was resolved during service, and there is no evidence linking it to service.,There is no current disability for diabetes mellitus, and the evidence does not show continuity of symptoms since service or any link between the condition and service.,The Veteran does not have a current diagnosis of hemorrhoids, and the medical evidence does not support a finding that his symptoms are related to service. The knot on groin (claimed as lymph node condition and possible hernia) was resolved during service, and there is no evidence linking it to service.,Service connection for chronic laryngitis is granted based on continuity of symptomatology since service.

Claimed conditions
gout, lower back condition, diabetes mellitus, hemorrhoids, knot on groin (claimed as lymph node condition and possible hernia), chronic laryngitis
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
December 11, 2018
Citation
18156559

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 18156559.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.