The Veteran's left eye disability, including choroidal atrophy and drusen, is remanded for further evaluation. His TDIU claim is also remanded due to its inextricably intertwined nature with the service connection issue.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner needs to determine if the Veteran’s current left eye disabilities are related to his in-service boiler room exposure and a reported flashback flame incident.
- Claimed conditions
- choroidal atrophy, drusen
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- December 14, 2018
- Citation
- 18158208
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 18158208.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the claim for service connection for an eye disability other than pterygium, finding that there is no evidence to support a link between current eye conditions and military service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to inconsistencies in previous examinations and need for further clarification on the nature and etiology of the Veteran's eye disabilities.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied service connection and compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for the Veteran's eye conditions, finding that they were not incurred in or related to his military service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient medical opinions regarding whether the Veteran's bilateral eye disabilities are related to his in-service exposure and strain.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.