Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The Veteran's bilateral lower extremity peripheral neuropathy is found to be related to his service-connected diabetes mellitus, Type II.,Obstructive sleep apnea is denied as the evidence does not support a connection with service.,Hypertension is denied due to lack of in-service diagnosis and no continuity of symptomatology.,High cholesterol (hyperlipidemia) is considered a laboratory finding and not a current disability for VA purposes.,A stomach condition other than irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) with diverticulitis and diverticulosis is denied as there is no evidence of such a condition.

The deciding factor: The September 2011 VA examiner found that the Veteran's bilateral lower extremity peripheral neuropathy was related to his service-connected diabetes mellitus, Type II.,There is no in-service diagnosis or continuity of symptomatology for obstructive sleep apnea.,Hypertension was not diagnosed within one year of separation from service and there is no evidence of chronic hypertension during service.,Hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol) is considered a laboratory finding and not a current disability for VA purposes.,The Veteran's stomach condition other than IBS with diverticulitis and diverticulosis has not been substantiated by the provided medical records.

Claimed conditions
bilateral lower extremity peripheral neuropathy, obstructive sleep apnea, hypertension, high cholesterol (hyperlipidemia), a stomach condition other than irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) with diverticulitis and diverticulosis
How they argued it
Secondary to another service-connected condition
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
December 14, 2018
Citation
18158256

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 18158256.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.