The Veteran's claim for service connection for hypertension is denied as the evidence does not support a finding that his current condition began during service or is related to an in-service injury, event, or disease.,The Veteran's claim for an evaluation higher than 10 percent for tinnitus is denied as there is no legal basis for such a benefit and the maximum schedular rating of 10 percent has been assigned.,The Veteran's claims for earlier effective dates prior to October 22, 2015, for service connection for left lower extremity femoral nerve radiculopathy and left lower extremity sciatic nerve radiculopathy are denied as the evidence does not support a finding that these conditions began during service or within one year of service.,The Veteran's claims for increased evaluations for bilateral hearing loss, lumbar spine degenerative arthritis, left lower extremity sciatic nerve radiculopathy, and left lower extremity femoral nerve radiculopathy are remanded as the most recent examination was in 2015.
The deciding factor: The preponderance of the evidence does not support a finding that the Veteran's hypertension is related to service or an in-service injury, event, or disease.
- Claimed conditions
- hypertension, tinnitus, left lower extremity femoral nerve radiculopathy, left lower extremity sciatic nerve radiculopathy
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- December 14, 2018
- Citation
- 18158412
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 18158412.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for hypertension and peripheral neuropathy of the bilateral upper and lower extremities due to insufficient medical opinions regarding their etiology.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for hearing loss, tinnitus, and an acquired psychiatric disorder due to incomplete medical records and need for further examination.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for tinnitus, arthritis, and memory loss. The decision found no evidence linking these conditions to his military service.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's tinnitus is granted as service connected. The issues of foot disability and cardiovascular disorder are remanded for additional development.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.