The Board has remanded the cases for further development, including obtaining medical records related to the Veteran's receipt of Tennessee State disability benefits.
The deciding factor: The decision was remanded due to a failure to obtain pertinent medical records from the Tennessee Department of Labor and Workforce Development.
- Claimed conditions
- cervical fusion, acquired psychiatric disorder (including PTSD and adjustment disorder with anxiety and depression)
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- December 28, 2018
- Citation
- 18160948
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 18160948.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's service connection for obstructive sleep apnea and cervical fusion as secondary to Parkinson's disease are granted, with an effective date of October 23, 2023.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection for multiple sclerosis, cervical fusion, and lumbar fusion due to incomplete records from his second period of service.
- Granted
The Board has granted the Veteran's claim of entitlement to service connection for a neck disorder as secondary to his service-connected back disability. The decision finds that reasonable doubt must be resolved in favor of the Veteran, and thus service connection is granted.
- Granted
The Board has granted service connection for cervical fusion with arthritis on a presumptive basis, finding that the Veteran's neck pain is related to his in-service back injury and that continuity of symptomatology exists.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.