The Board has reopened the Veteran's claim of entitlement to service connection for thoracic lordoscoliosis and is now considering it on its merits. The Veteran was previously denied in 2009, but new evidence supports reopening the claim.
The deciding factor: New medical opinions have been provided that suggest the Veteran's thoracic lordoscoliosis may be related to military service, despite being a congenital condition.
- Claimed conditions
- thoracic lordoscoliosis
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 16, 2018
- Citation
- 1816259
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1816259.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the claim of service connection for thoracic lordoscoliosis, concluding that it preexisted service and was not aggravated by service.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for thoracic lordoscoliosis in May 1981, finding that the condition was a congenital defect and not aggravated by service. The Veteran's motion alleged clear and unmistakable error (CUE) but the Board found no CUE.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to a need for issuance of a statement of the case regarding whether new and material evidence has been received to reopen the Veteran's claim of entitlement to service connection for thoracic lordoscoliosis.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for thoracic lordoscoliosis in a May 4, 1981 decision. The Veteran's motion alleging clear and unmistakable error (CUE) was denied as there was no evidence of clear and unmistakable error.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.