The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for carcinoma of the small intestine with metastasis to the liver, as there was no evidence that his condition was related to active duty or exposure to ionizing radiation. The other issues were not addressed in this decision.
The deciding factor: There is no credible evidence linking the Veteran's current condition to his military service or any exposure to ionizing radiation during service.
- Claimed conditions
- carcinoma of the small intestine with metastasis to the liver
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 20, 2018
- Citation
- 1817057
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1817057.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Partly granted
The Board granted service connection for carcinoma of the small intestine with metastasis to the liver, brain cancer, and colon cancer pursuant to the PACT Act. It also granted service connection on a direct basis for carcinoma of the small intestine with metastasis to the liver.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that further development is necessary to verify the Veteran's exposure to ionizing radiation during service, including alleged exposure to depleted uranium in Khamisiyah. The case is REMANDED for this purpose.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.