The Veteran is seeking service connection for a visual field defect with peripheral pterygium and right optic nerve atrophy, which he claims are related to his active duty service. The Board has determined that additional medical examination and opinion are needed to determine the etiology of these conditions.
The deciding factor: The Board finds that further medical evaluation is necessary to determine whether the Veteran's current eye disabilities are related to his active duty service.
- Claimed conditions
- visual field defect, peripheral pterygium, right optic nerve atrophy
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- March 22, 2018
- Citation
- 1817861
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1817861.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for a visual field defect and/or degenerative retinal drunsens/senile macular degeneration, finding that there was no evidence to support a nexus between these conditions and his active duty service.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board has denied service connection for multiple conditions and denied higher initial ratings for several service-connected disabilities.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's claims for an effective date earlier than October 14, 2009 and a higher initial rating for dry eyes with visual field defect were denied. The Board found that the earliest effective date possible was October 14, 2009, as it is the date of claim. The Veteran did not have incapacitating episodes or other conditions warranting a higher initial rating.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has granted the Veteran's application for specially adapted housing due to his service-connected disabilities that affect his mobility and require a wheelchair and assistive devices.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.