The Board has determined that the Veteran's current benign essential blepharospasm is not shown to be etiologically related to service, including as due to herbicide agents. Therefore, the claim for service connection is denied.
The deciding factor: There is no evidence showing a direct relationship between the Veteran's benign essential blepharospasm and his military service or exposure to herbicide agents.
- Claimed conditions
- benign essential blepharospasm
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- March 22, 2018
- Citation
- 1818215
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1818215.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has granted service connection for benign essential blepharospasm as due to exposure to herbicide agents, finding that the evidence supports a link between the condition and Agent Orange exposure.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for benign essential blepharospasm, finding that there was not enough evidence to support a link between the condition and in-service exposure to herbicide agents.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's motion to vacate the denial of service connection for benign essential blepharospasm was granted due to a lack of due process.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to inadequate medical opinion regarding the Veteran's eye disability, specifically benign essential blepharospasm. The case is sent back for another examination by a neurologist.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.