Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Whole decision: Denied

The Veteran's hypertension is rated as 60 percent disabling under the applicable rating criteria, and a higher schedular rating is not warranted.,Service connection for aldosteronism is denied. The most competent evidence supports the finding that aldosteronism causes or aggravates hypertension, but there is no evidence to support the claim of service connection for aldosteronism as proximately caused by hypertension.,Obstructive sleep apnea is not found to be directly related to the Veteran's service-connected disabilities. The examiner opines that weight gain due to medications used to treat his service-connected conditions may have contributed to the development of obstructive sleep apnea.

The deciding factor: The criteria for an increased schedular and extraschedular rating in excess of 60 percent for hypertension are not met.,There is no evidence to support the claim that aldosteronism is caused or aggravated by service-connected hypertension. The Veteran's contentions regarding the link between his medications and weight gain/obstructive sleep apnea need further clarification from a VA examiner.,Obstructive sleep apnea was not found to be directly related to the Veteran's service-connected disabilities, but may have been exacerbated by weight gain due to medications used to treat his service-connected conditions.

Claimed conditions
hypertension, aldosteronism
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating
Not verified here — check the original decision
Decision date
April 3, 2018
Citation
1819605

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1819605.

What this means for you

A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.

What you can do next

Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.