The Board has determined that additional development is necessary before a decision can be made regarding the Veteran's claims for service connection for thoracolumbar degenerative changes and left pelvis injury. The case will be remanded to obtain updated VA treatment records, as well as a VA examination to determine the etiology of these disabilities.
The deciding factor: The Board finds that new examinations are necessary to address the Veteran's claims due to the lack of discussion in previous opinions regarding his contention that his thoracolumbar and left pelvis disabilities are related to his service-connected fracture of the left fibia and tibia with fracture of left medial femoral condyle and degenerative changes of the left ankle.
- Claimed conditions
- thoracolumbar degenerative changes, left pelvis injury
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 24, 2018
- Citation
- 1824314
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1824314.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's initial claim for a higher rating for thoracolumbar degenerative changes was granted, with a uniform 40 percent rating effective December 10, 2021. The VA initially scheduled the Veteran for a back conditions examination in March 2022 to determine his disability level and assigned him this rating based on his limited range of motion.
- Granted
The Board has granted the Veteran's appeal as his timely filed VA Form 9 was received, and the presumption of regularity in mailing the Statement of the Case (SOC) to his attorney has been rebutted.
- Denied
The Veteran's cause of death was not due to service-connected disabilities, and the VA-prescribed medications did not result in an additional disability or death. The Board found that the medications prescribed for his service-connected conditions were not causally related to his death.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient evidence regarding the cause of the Veteran's death and whether VA negligence in providing medical care contributed to his death. The appellant is seeking service connection for the cause of her husband’s death, which was caused by a combination of diabetes mellitus type II, hypertension, and other conditions related to his service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.