The Board has determined that the Veteran's HIV did not begin during his active service and is not otherwise etiologically related to any event, injury, or disease during his active military service. The Veteran's HIV was not caused by or aggravated by any service-connected disability.,The Board also found that the Veteran's rectal warts did not begin during his active service and are not otherwise etiologically related to any event, injury, or disease during his active military service; the Veteran's condition manifested by rectal warts was not caused by or aggravated by any service-connected disability.
The deciding factor: The evidence is against finding that the Veteran's HIV began during his active service and is etiologically related to an injury or event in service. The only medical opinion of record supporting the Veteran's theory is not stated in sufficiently definite language to warrant much probative value.,The April 2014 VA examiner opined that the current condition was less likely than not incurred in or caused by the in-service infection, explaining that after successful treatment during service, the Veteran had no outbreaks or symptoms until roughly 2011 and that the medical literature indicates that such infections are transient and cleared within two years.
- Claimed conditions
- Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), Rectal Warts
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- April 26, 2018
- Citation
- 1825720
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 1825720.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board has denied service connection for treatment purposes only for PTSD and remanded the claim of service connection for treatment purposes only for HIV.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran is found to be eligible for enrollment in the PCAFC program due to his severe and complex medical conditions, which require personal care services.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has determined that the Veteran contracted HIV during his active duty service and grants entitlement to service connection for this condition.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board has denied service connection for HIV and rhabdomyolysis due to lack of evidence linking these conditions to the Veteran's active duty from April 1987 to August 1987. The Board found no current chronic disability, no in-service event, injury, or disease, and no link between a current disability and service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.