The Veteran's appeal is being remanded due to the need for a new VA examination and additional VA treatment records. The claim will be reconsidered after these are obtained.
The deciding factor: The case was remanded because of the need for updated medical evidence and an appropriate VA examination.
- Claimed conditions
- leukocytoclastic vasculitis, Henoch-Schonlein purpura
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- May 1, 2018
- Citation
- 1826393
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 1826393.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to a duty to assist error. The VA-contracted medical opinion did not provide an adequate rationale regarding whether the Veteran's Henoch-Schonlein purpura had its onset in service or is otherwise related to service.
- Granted
The Board granted service connection for rosacea, leukocytoclastic vasculitis, acneiform eruption, and seborrheic dermatitis based on the evidence showing that these skin conditions were incurred in service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims of service connection for rheumatoid arthritis, leukocytoclastic vasculitis, and recurrent infections due to inadequate examination findings and failure to address the Veteran's arguments regarding in-service vaccinations.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for service connection for Henoch-Schonlein purpura, kidney disability (renal failure and right kidney transplant residuals), and abdominal hernia were denied. The Board has determined that further development is needed in all three cases.,Specifically, the Board found that a VA examination report regarding the tremor disability was of limited probative value due to conflicting findings and other deficiencies. Additionally, the Veteran's claims for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for splenectomy residuals are also remanded.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.