Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection due to insufficient evidence regarding the current severity of his service-connected bilateral pes planus with degenerative changes at the first MTP and residuals of ganglion cyst of right 2nd toe and left 3rd toe with scars, as well as other service-connected disabilities. The Veteran is also being remanded for a VA examination to determine the extent of these conditions.,The Board has also remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection due to insufficient evidence regarding his claimed disorders, including headaches, jaw disorder, left arm disorder, right hand disorder, and left knee disorder.

The deciding factor: There is insufficient medical evidence to support a decision on the current severity of the Veteran's service-connected bilateral pes planus with degenerative changes at the first MTP and residuals of ganglion cyst of right 2nd toe and left 3rd toe with scars, as well as other service-connected disabilities. Additionally, there is insufficient medical evidence to support a decision on the Veteran's claims for service connection due to his claimed disorders.

Claimed conditions
Headaches, to include Migraines, Jaw Disorder, Left Arm Disorder (Specifically including Radiculopathy and the Wrist), Left Foot Disorder (Other than Already Service-Connected Pes Planus with Degenerative Changes at the First MTP and Residuals of Ganglion Cyst of Right 2nd Toe and Left 3rd Toe with Scars, Specifically Including Foot Drop), Left Knee Disorder (Including Left Knee Instability), Left Shoulder Disorder, Neck Disorder, Right Hand Disorder
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
August 15, 2019
Citation
A19000923

Veterans Law Judge

H.M. WALKER

Decisions by this judge: 2,569 · Granted: 26% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A19000923.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.