The Veteran's claim for aid and attendance was denied in February 2018, which became final. He filed a new claim on October 15, 2018, and the VA granted it effective from that date. The Board denied an earlier effective date as there is no provision allowing such under current laws and regulations.
The deciding factor: The governing laws and regulations do not contain exceptions for granting an earlier effective date based on worsening service-connected disabilities or other circumstances.
- Claimed conditions
- service-connected disabilities
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 7, 2019
- Citation
- A19002635
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A19002635.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's service connection for migraine headaches and PTSD was granted, along with special monthly compensation (SMC) based on the need for regular aid and attendance.
- Granted
The Veteran's appeal for Total Disability Individual Unemployability (TDIU) based on service-connected disabilities has been granted. The Board found that the Veteran's disabilities preclude him from maintaining substantially gainful employment.
- Partly granted
The veteran's appeal resulted in a mixed decision. Some ratings were granted, such as a 30 percent rating for anemia secondary to diabetes mellitus and increased ratings for diabetic neuropathy. However, other claims, including higher ratings for diabetes mellitus and earlier effective dates for service connection, were denied.
- Partly granted
The veteran's claim for a higher disability rating for tinnitus was denied. Other claims related to prostate cancer residuals, PTSD, TDIU, and DEA benefits were remanded for further review.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.