The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient evidence regarding the Veteran's exposure to benzene in service and its relation to his MDS.
The deciding factor: The decision is based on the lack of sufficient evidence linking the Veteran’s MDS to his service, specifically his claimed exposure to benzene from jet fuel.
- Claimed conditions
- Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- December 3, 2019
- Citation
- A19003273
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 793 · Granted: 28% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation A19003273.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has granted service connection for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) due to the evidence being at least in approximate balance as to whether the Veteran's MDS is etiologically related to his active service.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's cause of death, which included MDS, is found to be related to his exposure to herbicide agents while serving in the Republic of Vietnam. Service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death is granted.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient opinions regarding whether the Veteran's hematologic disorder is caused or aggravated by his service-connected conditions, including coronary artery disease (CAD), diabetes mellitus type II (DMII), and bladder cancer residuals.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient information provided in the addendum opinion regarding whether the Veteran's hematologic disorder was aggravated by his service-connected conditions, including CAD, DMII, and bladder cancer residuals.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.