Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's lumbosacral strain is currently rated at 20 percent, and the Board finds no basis to grant a higher rating.,PTSD was initially rated at 30 percent prior to September 15, 2017, and at 70 percent thereafter. The Board finds no basis for an increased rating.,The Veteran's claim for neuropathy sciatic nerve, right lower extremity (RLE) secondary to lumbosacral strain was granted with an effective date of July 24, 2012.,The Veteran's claim for neuropathy sciatic nerve, left lower extremity (LLE) secondary to lumbosacral strain did not meet the criteria for an earlier effective date.

The deciding factor: The evidence does not support a higher rating for lumbosacral strain as it does not result in favorable or unfavorable ankylosis of the thoracolumbar spine, nor does it show significant loss of range of motion due to pain or weakness.,PTSD did not meet criteria for increased ratings as there was no evidence of occupational and social impairment with deficiencies in work, family relations, judgment, thinking, or mood beyond what is already reflected by the current 30 percent and 70 percent ratings.,The Veteran's claim for neuropathy sciatic nerve, right lower extremity (RLE) secondary to lumbosacral strain was granted as it met the criteria of having a service-connected disability that caused or aggravated a non-service-connected condition.,The earlier effective date for neuropathy sciatic nerve, left lower extremity (LLE) did not meet the criteria due to lack of evidence showing aggravation by the service-connected lumbosacral strain.

Claimed conditions
lumbosacral strain, neuropathy sciatic nerve, right lower extremity (RLE), neuropathy sciatic nerve, left lower extremity (LLE)
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
January 8, 2019
Citation
19101243

Veterans Law Judge

KRISTI L. GUNN

Decisions by this judge: 2,062 · Granted: 34% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19101243.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.