Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The Veteran's diabetes mellitus, type II, is presumed to have been incurred during service due to herbicide exposure.,Service connection for peripheral neuropathy of the bilateral lower extremities is granted as it is at least as likely as not caused by his diabetes mellitus.,Service connection for a sleep disorder and an acquired psychiatric disorder (anxiety and depression) are denied.,The Veteran's service-connected diabetes mellitus, type II, is presumed to have been incurred during service due to herbicide exposure.

The deciding factor: The Veteran was exposed to herbicides while serving in Thailand at Udorn RTAFB from July 1968 to August 1969. His diabetes mellitus, type II, is presumed to have been incurred during service based on such exposure.,Service connection for peripheral neuropathy of the bilateral lower extremities is granted as it is at least as likely as not caused by his now service-connected diabetes mellitus.,There is no evidence of a current diagnosis or relationship between the Veteran's sleep disorder and psychiatric conditions (anxiety and depression) and his military service.,The Veteran's service-connected diabetes mellitus, type II, is presumed to have been incurred during service based on herbicide exposure.

Claimed conditions
diabetes mellitus, type II, peripheral neuropathy of the bilateral lower extremities, sleep disorder, acquired psychiatric disorder (anxiety and depression)
How they argued it
Presumptive (no nexus needed)
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
January 7, 2019
Citation
19101425

Veterans Law Judge

LESLEY A. REIN

Decisions by this judge: 2,240 · Granted: 28% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19101425.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.